Introduction to the Internet Casino and Sportsbook Business MAIN
Software Licensing and a List of Companies that Provide Internet Casino and Sportsbook Software SOFTWARE
Internet Marketing Companies that get Web Traffic to a Casino Web Site MARKETING
Sublicensing an Internet Casino operation from a Licensee SUBLICENSING
Payment Processing and Merchant Accounts for Internet Casino operations to use ECOMMERCE
Software Considerations GAMETYPES
Legislation issues for the USA and abroad LEGAL
Internet Sportsbook and Casino and Other Gambling/Casino Related Conferences CONFERENCES
Economic Factors worth considering with an Internet Casino and Sportsbook Operation ECONOMICS
Things to Watch for when Starting an Internet Sportsbook and Casino Business PITFALLS
Forums - Hear what others have to say about the business MESSAGE BOARDS
Internet Casino Links: News, Stocks, Organizations, etc. LINKS
About Yorktown Ventures and the Author ABOUT US

STARTCASINO . COM
Independent Information Site on Starting an Internet Casino Business
 
 
MESSAGE BOARDS           Social Bookmarks:  Delicious  Digg  Reddit  Magnolia  Newsvine  Furl  Facebook  Technorati

By both reading the contents of and posting on this message board, you agree to our Disclaimers

Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
WTO Clears $21M in Sanctions Vs. US
Posted by: Mcluhan (---.ppp.ucc-net.ca)
Date: December 21, 2007 01:49PM

[ap.google.com]

WTO Clears $21M in Sanctions Vs. US

By BRADLEY S. KLAPPER – 4 hours ago

GENEVA (AP) — The United States faces a token $21 million in annual trade sanctions as a result of its online betting ban, the World Trade Organization said Friday in awarding Antigua and Barbuda the right to target U.S. services, copyrights and trademarks.

The decision is a setback for the Caribbean island nation, which sought the right to impose $3.4 billion in retaliatory measures against U.S. commercial services and intellectual property.

Washington acknowledged its Internet gambling restrictions were ruled illegal by the WTO, but argued that Antigua should only be compensated for about $500,000 for lost annual revenue.

The case has drawn the attention of a number of U.S. industries, partly because of the ways Antigua has proposed retaliating against the much larger U.S. economy. Washington's attempt to escape its legal loss by proposing a revision of the WTO's key treaty on trade in services has also fueled interest.

The office of the U.S. Trade Representative noted that Antigua was seeking sanctions worth more than three times the size of its entire economy.

"Antigua's claim was patently excessive," it said in a statement. "The United States is pleased that the figure arrived at by the arbitrator is over 100 times lower than Antigua's claim."

The U.S. and Antigua cannot appeal Friday's decision.

Realistically, it would have been very difficult for a country the size of Antigua's to implement hundreds of millions of dollars worth of trade sanctions on the U.S. without harming its own economy and the welfare of its citizens. Ecuador was awarded similar retaliation rights in a bananas dispute with the European Union in 2000, but failed to come up with an effective way to introduce countermeasures.

The WTO arbitration panel said it had to adopt its own approach to come up with a fair retaliation figure in view of the wide difference in how the U.S. and Antigua estimated the economic effect of the gambling ban.

"In doing so, we feel we are on shaky grounds," the panel said in an 88-page decision.

Washington stopped U.S. banks and credit card companies last year from processing payments to online gambling businesses outside the country. The decision closed off the most lucrative region in a growing market worth about $15.5 billion last year. About half of the world's online gamblers are based in the U.S.

The arrest in 2006 of two British Internet gambling executives while traveling through the United States also highlighted the U.S. government's escalation of its battle against the industry.

The WTO, however, upheld in March previous rulings striking down the U.S ban.

The trade body found that the U.S. had the right to prevent offshore betting as a means of protecting public order and public morals. But it said Washington was violating trade law by targeting online gambling without equal application of the rules to American operators offering remote betting on horse and dog racing.

Antigua, the smallest country to successfully litigate a case in the WTO's 12-year-history, had hoped the ruling would lead the U.S. to revoke the restrictions.

The former British colony of about 80,000 people had been promoting electronic commerce as a way to end the country's reliance on tourism, which was hurt by a series of hurricanes in the late 1990s. There are 32 licensed online casinos in Antigua, employing 1,000 people and generating a yearly revenue of around $130 million. Seven years ago, its casinos had an annual income closer to $1 billion.

But Washington responded to its legal defeat by announcing it would take the unprecedented step of revising the conditions under which it signed the WTO's 1994 General Agreement on Trade in Services, or GATS. That allowed a number of countries to seek compensation under a separate process.

The U.S. has since agreed on deals with the 27-nation European Union, Canada and Japan to change the treaty — but has failed to do so with Antigua, Costa Rica, India and Macau.

Until it gains the approval of all 151 members of the WTO, the U.S. online betting ban is illegal under international trade rules. As a result, Antigua will have the right to penalize U.S. services and intellectual property until the U.S. government either permits Americans to gamble over foreign-based sites or eliminates exceptions for off-track betting on horses, including over the Internet.

British gambling companies — which bankrolled Antigua's efforts and heavily lobbied Brussels for tough action — were disappointed earlier this week when the EU announced that it had received some minor U.S. trade concessions in exchange for accepting the U.S.-proposed revision to the GATS.

The deal fell far short of the $100 billion in new commercial opportunities the Internet gaming sites claimed the United States owed.

Re: WTO Clears $21M in Sanctions Vs. US
Posted by: tone (---.rev.greendottt.net)
Date: December 25, 2007 09:33AM

The WTO has since ruled that $21m a year for a set number of years is fair.

Typically the US has already requested a deferrment on the first payment.

I wonder how it feels to be a "patriot" of the United States, knowing that your government just destroys the livelihoods of other people at the blink of an eye.

WTO penalty is a crushing blow
Posted by: yorktown (Moderator)
Date: December 26, 2007 06:50AM

This was a show stopper for the industry.

Everyone in the business was counting on the WTO decision against the USA to turn the tide for Online Gambling.

Not having Europe support this was crushing. With everything going on in the EU to support online gambling, I was one along with many industry pundits that believed the US had the cards stacked against them.

The USA played an excellent game of cards here and came up with a full house: 3 Aces and 2 Kings.

TO have Antigua alone having a ruling against the USA in a WTO case is meaningless. Often, South American and Latin Countries have WTO decisions against the USA on other trade items. For some of these countries, their only recourse is to halt the sale of agriculture to the USA, something they can ill afford to do.

I hear that things now are becoming extremely difficult in Costa Rica. I suspect that the USA is going to ride this decision and push policy to the max.

This industry is filled with ups and downs. This is another down period for the industry.

Tone, you will see this more and more in politics...even in your own country. By calling bills the 'Protect your Country Act' or the 'Save the Children Act' or the 'Support the troops Act' any politician would be a fool to vote against it. It would look bad when they come up for re-election, regardless of what it actually says in the bill.

Webmaster
StartCasino.com



Re: WTO penalty is a crushing blow
Posted by: Mcluhan (---.ppp.ucc-net.ca)
Date: December 27, 2007 12:13AM

Quote: " I hear that things now are becoming extremely difficult in Costa Rica. I suspect that the USA is going to ride this decision and push policy to the max. "

Hmmm... can any 'boots on the ground' in CR comment more on this particular topic? I have not heard anything specific.. other than I have the odd friend moving the shop to Panama because the crime rate is up in san jose..




Your Name: 
Your Email: 
Subject: 

This is a moderated forum. Your message will remain hidden until it has been approved by a moderator or administrator
 



MAIN    SOFTWARE    MARKETING    SUBLICENSING    E-COMMERCE    GAME TYPES    LEGAL ISSUES    CONFERENCES    ECONOMICS    PITFALLS    MESSAGE BOARDS    LINKS    ABOUT US


Questions/Comments? Email the WEBMASTER
Interested in Advertising on this page? E-mail HERE
   Last Update: May 2012    Legal Disclaimers
Copyright © 2000-2012
Yorktown Ventures, Inc
All rights reserved